Traditional psychoanalysis is based on the interpretation of unconscious conflicts. This approach relied on another completely fallible human being with his or her own unconscious conflict and problems to make accurate interpretations. Comment on how this approach can have legitimacy. Does a contemporary psychoanalytic two-person psychology model offer any improvement in this regard?

Initially psychoanalytic theories viewed the patient as a separate individual, and the therapist rarely involved anything except processing the client's knowledge.

Presently, psychoanalytic therapy approaches clients as living human beings and the therapist works directly with clients by encouraging and assisting them to always have intelligent discussions and letting them recognize the value of discussing the experiences and situations that most influenced them during their childhood.

Thus, even the psycho-dynamic counseling has been centered on humans and provides more clinical interaction.

pretty sure a is right

the old way of life was represented by superstition, an angry god, and absolute submission to authority. the thinkers of the age of reason ushered in a new way of thinking. this new way championed the accomplishments of humankind. individuals did not have to accept despair. science and reason could bring happiness and progress. kings did not rule by divine right. they had an obligation to their subjects. europeans pondered the implications for nearly a century. americans put them into practice first.