Which statement best explains how the constitution adressed a weakness

The correct answer is The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.

The American Constitution was promulgated in 1787 and ratified two years later by the 13 American states.

In 1791, the American Magna Carta would receive the addition of the Bill of Rights.

The chief concern of delegates was to seek a balance between centralizing power in the hands of a president and maintaining the autonomy of states. Likewise, the executive branch should be surrounded by laws that prevent it from making the government a tyranny.

"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to guarantee internal tranquility, to promote common defense, the general well-being and to ensure the benefits of freedom for us and for our descendants, we promulgated and established the Constitution for the United States of America."

they had freedom from the government and from the affairs

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.