How did the Berlin Conference of 1884 cause conflicts in Africa that continue to the modern day? The conference created economic barriers to trade, which hurt African countries' abilities to import goods. The conference allowed Europeans to sell weapons to African countries, leading to an arms race on the continent.. The conference encouraged rapid industrialization, which led to famine as many Africans stopped farming. The conference ignored existing boundaries when creating colonies, leading to territorial disputes after decolonization.

The conference allowed Europeans to sell weapons to African countries, leading to an arms race on the continent.

Explanation:

The Berlin conference of 1884 was called for by the Portuguese but hosted by German chancellor in 1884 in Berlin. the main purpose of the conference was on how regulate European colonization of Africa without the European Nations going to war among  themselves and also regulate slave trade in Africa. some of the positive effects of this conference was the intention by the European nations to eliminate slave trade in Africa.

The conference allowing Europeans to sell weapons to African countries leading to arms race on the continent is still a problem plaguing Africa till date with several Militia terrorist groups springing up all over Africa in Modern times.

Every other results of the conference caused conflicts in Africa but the result still causing conflicts till date is :  The conference allowed Europeans to sell weapons to African countries, leading to an arms race on the continent

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.