subject
Social Studies, 17.03.2020 20:24 justinchou814

Below are views for and against publicly funded elections.
It is unfair to force taxpayers
to pay for opinions they do
not support. Voters should be
able to express their opinions
by giving candidates as much
money as they want.
Candidates would spend less
time trying to raise money and
spend more time talking about
the issues. Some people can
afford to give more money to
candidates, which gives their
opinion an unfair advantage.
Which conclusion can be drawn from these views?
A. Running an election campaign takes many taxpayers.
B. Campaigning for elected office requires many opinions.
C. Campaigning for elected office takes a large amount of time.
D. Running an election campaign requires a large sum of money
ted Education Association, Inc. © 2015

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Who built the first turnpikes in the united states? a) the national government b) state governments c) private companies d) town councils
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
Should the u.s limit the number of terms a lawmaker serves in the u.s congress 5 paragraph response argumentative
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
Imagine you are driving down the highway and reading a sign that states save the planet don't litter which technique of policy enactment is being used
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:50
Nepal is the common garden of different caste ethnic groups language and culture briefly explain the statements
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Below are views for and against publicly funded elections.
It is unfair to force taxpayers
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.09.2021 14:00
question
English, 11.09.2021 14:00
question
Chemistry, 11.09.2021 14:00
question
English, 11.09.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722363