The State of Georgia in the judgment of this Convention, will and ought to resist a disruption
of every tie which binds her to the Union, any action of Congress upon the subject of slavery in the
District of Columbia, or in any places subject to the jurisdiction of Congress incompatible with the
safety, domestie tranquility, the rights and honor of the slave-holding States, or any refusal to
admit as a State any territory hereafter, applying, because of the existence of slavery therein, or
any act prohibiting the introduction of slaves into the territories of New Mexico and Utah, or any
act repeating or materially modifying the laws now in force for the recovery of fugitive slaves."
from The Georgia Platform December 10, 1850
After reading this statement, which statement BEST summarizes the official opinion of the state of
Georgia?
Georgia wanted to secede from the United States.
Georgia politicians were tired of dealing with the Federal
government
Georgia wanted to prevent the expansion of slavery into New
Mexico and Utah
Georgia was willing to work with the Federal government to
prevent future problems.

What specific words do you hear in dr. king’s speech that are powerful

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

What was the purpose of the cuban revolution