Five-year-old Jamal was surprised to discover that a Band-Aids box contained pencils. Yet, Jamal was able to anticipate that his friends, who had not yet seen the box, would be fooled (i. e., his friends would believe that the box contained Band-Aids). This best illustrates that Jamal has developed:
a. conservation.
b. theory of mind.
c. a sense of object permanence.
d. Egocentrism.

b) Theory of mind.

Explanation:

Theory of mind is the concept that depicts thinking ability of a person to allocate and understand beliefs, thoughts, point of view, emotions, action etc to own-self and as well as others.

According to the question, theory of mind is depicted through Jamal's understanding and attribution that other friends will also be surprised through seeing band-aid box containing pencils as he was also surprised.

Other options are incorrect because egocentrism, conversation and object performance's sense are not the sense developed by Jamal.Thus, the correct option is option(b).

pretty sure a is right

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: