Some theorists think that a legitimate question in allocating transplant organs is which potential recipients—if given the chance to live—are expected to contribute most to the good of society. a. Trueb. False

.a. True

Explanation:

The theorists thought about the legitimate question on the potential recipents of organs contributing most to the good of the society is a good and true.

Imagine a situation where by someone that was jailed for robbery for 15years having 5 months to complete his or her sentence. The person was diagonised with kidney failure and needed kidney transplant which was successfully done. It is a logical thing that, he or she should be of ggod behaviour when he comes out from the presion rather than going back to his old ways, committing more violent crimes and on an alchol drinking spree.

This actions of that person would definitely negates the aim of the donor of the organ when made aware that the recipent is far more a nusiance to the society than he was before the transplant was carried out.

i would say d tho   ctfvygbuhinjmlk

answer; john stuart mill's principle of utility is your answer; /// good luck