Some sociologists think that researchers should be able to mislead subjects to get unbiased results as long as the subjects aren’t getting hurt. If they can’t deceive them, the subjects are likely to perceive the purpose of the research and shape their behavior, leading to invalid results. For example, twelve female college freshmen and twelve male college freshmen are brought into a room to get their opinions about football. They discuss football. The sociologists really aren’t interested in their opinions about football. What they are doing is analyzing flirting behavior: the women’s and men’s facial expressions, their body language, and their words. If these subjects were told the real purpose of the research, it would change their behavior. What is your opinion? Why?

I THINK IT IS WRONG TO MISLEAD SUBJECTS JUST TO GET UNBAISED RESULTS.

Explanation: Research is a process of Evaluating or inquiring about a particular cause and effect relationship,research helps scientists and other persons who carry it out to discover the root cause of a particular situation.

RESEARCH HAS SOME BASIC ETHICAL STANDARDS WHICH MUST BE FOLLOWED IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AN UNBAISED AND A ACCEPTABLE RESULTS THEY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING

(1) HONESTY

(2) PRUDENCE

(3) INTERGRITY

(4) FAIRNESS

(5) AUTONOMY

(6) CONFIDENTIALITY

(7) PROCEDURAL JUSTICE

(8) SOCIAL JUSTICE

All these ethical standards are necessary to ensure that a research is effectively done.

watching over my siblings so they are safe.

jacksonian era promoted strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of congress. it also sought to broaden the public's participation in government. the jacksonian's demanded to have elected judges, instead of appointed judges, and rewrote many state constitutions to reflect the new values. hope this ! if you did find it would you mind giving me brainliest? : )