How were British settlements different from French and Spanish settlements?

Although the British colonies started later than both the French and Spanish, it quickly outpaced both in North America. The English colonists were better fed, clothed, and housed than their counterparts. One reason for this was that the French and Spanish colonies were characterized by strong central control exercised by the monarchy. It helped them to get off the mark quickly, but in the end hindered innovation and their ability to deal with changing circumstances. Both the French and Spanish empires were vast. The English colonies were tightly grouped along the Atlantic coastline. This provided them with communication and transportation benefits.

the british colonies were developed economically as compared to french and spanish colonies the french colonies were sparsely populated they were mainly used to promote trade with the indians for fur the english and french colonies were densely populated and the citizens were more civilized

( hope this helps )

they could have terrible tropical storms which will destroy the crops in the colonies

the third answer is correct (c).

the laws that regulate the financing of political campaigns seek to guarantee the smoothness of funding so that there is no abuse of electoral economic power and to avoid the capture of future politicians by the donors.

this is because donor agents have their private interests that are not necessarily the same interests of the society that elected politicians must defend.

thus, interest groups should seek their interests within the legality of lobbying practices that are regulated.