The principle of may be used to invalidate a waiver if there is a huge disparity of bargaining power between the entity seeking to have the waiver upheld and the prospective signer of the waiver.

The greek polises were city states that lived independently of each other and had their own laws and their own culture. those that were democratic were mostly based around direct democracy but not everyone had voting rights. sometimes there were kings but they would often get exiled if the people decided that they were getting too powerful. this was especially common in athens.the roman republic was a bit different. there was centralized government of all cities and territories and laws were made using a form of representative democracy, which means that there was a senate full of senators who made decisions for everyone. they would get chosen to those positions or earn them.the roman republic turned into the roman empire when it was established that the senate was corrupt and didn't care about people. then people started becoming emperors who usually ruled like dictators and there was no democratic decision making. this is the type of rule that we saw from caesar and those after him. this was also the type of rule when the roman empire divided and fell.

The correct answer to this question is the first option, george wallace makes reference to the doctrine written by america’s forefathers, which suggests that separate states can form their own laws. he asserts that the reason why the founding fathers separated the states was so that they could have differing governing ways.