subject
Social Studies, 06.03.2020 06:07 anggar20

A group of children, ranging in age from 8 to 15, regularly played football on the common area of an apartment complex owned by O'Neill. Most of the children lived in the apartment complex, but some lived elsewhere. O'Neill knew that the children played on the common area and had not objected.

Peter, a 13-year-old who did not live in the apartment complex, fell over a sprinkler head while running for a pass and broke his leg. Although Peter had played football on the common area before, he had never noticed the sprinkler heads, which protruded one inch above ground and were part of a permanently installed underground sprinkler system.

If a claim is asserted on Peter's behalf, Peter will
A) prevail if the sprinkler head was a hazard that Peter probably would not discover.
B) prevail, because O'Neill had not objected to children playing on the common area.
C) not prevail, because Peter did not live in the apartment complex.
D) not prevail unless the sprinkler heads were abnormally dangerous to users of the common area.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Use your map on page 347 to find europe (hint: there is a smaller map on the bottom of that page that shows you specifics! ) name three countries in europe. *
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:50
What refers to the existence of more than one level of government in the country
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:10
Which of the following can be a useful clue about an organization’s culture? multiple choice information printed in the media the industrial environment environmental scanning the macroenvironment who is hired and fired
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A group of children, ranging in age from 8 to 15, regularly played football on the common area of an...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.04.2021 23:20
question
Mathematics, 02.04.2021 23:20
question
Mathematics, 02.04.2021 23:20
question
Biology, 02.04.2021 23:20
question
Mathematics, 02.04.2021 23:20
question
Mathematics, 02.04.2021 23:20
Questions on the website: 13722361