Rose has never had intercourse, and will be getting married in 3 months. She is concerned about experiencing pain from tearing of her hymen. Of all the comments she receives from her girlfriends, the advice LEAST likely to be helpful is from .

Angie, who tells her not to worry about the pain because her use of tampons over the years has gotten rid of the hymen.

Explanation:

Rose feel fear about pain from tearing of her hymen, and one of her friend guides her that she must not feel worry as her hymen is already stretched because of using tampons in menstrual cycle.  As hymen is thin tissue which may stretch due to using of tampons, but she must not worry about pain from tearing of hymen as her body  is used and already contact with tampons.

Angie, who tells her not to worry about the pain because her use of tampons over the years has gotten rid of the hymen.

Explanation:

Angie, who tells her not to worry about the pain because her use of tampons over the years has gotten rid of the hymen.

Rose's hymen is already stretched because of using tampons in menstrual cycle.The hymen is a thin piece of mucosal tissue that surrounds or partially covers the external vaginal opening. It is similar in structure to the vagina.  The hymen may strech due to using of tampons, Rose should worry less as the use of tampons could have already done the job

idk

explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.