Why is interpretation a problem with laws? I need this ASAP. I'm filling out a study guide so I can study for my test today.

The interpretation of laws in general aims to focus on a certain legal relationship, clearly and accurately identifying the rule established by the legislator and which must be applied to the specific case.

And, this is not to be confused with the legal hermeneutics that corresponds to the part of Law as a science whose object is the study and systematization of the processes that must be used for the interpretation to take place.

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation:

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.