Groothuis probably thinks that evangelicals who have abandoned the correspondence view of truth have undermined apologetics, and would probably not be able to persuade people of other religions to believe that Christianity is true.
True
False

This is "TRUE".

Explanation:

Douglas R. Groothuis is Professor of Philosophy of religion and ethics at Denver Seminary. He was a campus pastor. He is the author of "Christian apologetics", unmasking the new Age", "The soul in cyberspace", and many more.

In one of his books called "Christian apologetics", Douglas R. Groothuis said that Christian's should consider other people view of truth and righteous living, so it would be more easier to use the person's understanding and convert him or her to believe that Christianity is true

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.