Justify the inclusion of heritage social studies in the primary school curriculum 100 marks

The heritage in social studies of the school circular is a very important topic and the main purpose includes the justification that gives students rational values.

Hence its is essential.

Learn more about heritage social studies in the primary school curriculum.

The main purposes and justifications for including heritage education in social studies of primary school curriculum are;

to equip the students with intelligent and fruitful participation in the society

to produce a sense of national unity

Explanation:

Heritages are items of special historical and cultural importance handed down from generation to generation of a nation as a whole.

Heritage is an integral part of society and culture, a knowledge about this will improve students' better understand the foundation of their society and culture.

Heritage education is the main component of a core curriculum and common learning advanced by Ernest Boyer, William Bennett, and many other curriculum reformers of the 1980s. Heritage education creates national unity by teaching consequential ideas, experiences, and traditions common to all of the students.

The students having learned heritage during primary education will be in better position to opt fine arts, sociology, and history for their specialization at higher education levels.

experiments.

surveys.

questionnaires.

interviews.

case studies.

participant and non-participant observation.

observational trials.

studies using the delphi method.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals