subject
Social Studies, 28.01.2020 06:31 send2tejas

Ateacher finds the distribution of scores on a final exam to be positively skewed with low variability. on the basis of this information, the teacher would be most justified in concluding that
1. a small number of students in the class did poorly on the exam
2. the students in her classroom have a very wide range of intellectual abilities
3. the exam was too difficult
4. the exam is not a reliable assessment tool
5. most of her students are of above average ability

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20
Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:30
Many scholars and observers have argued that the ratification of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution has become the single most important act in all of united states politics. (a) identify which provision of the fourteenth amendment was applied to the following supreme court cases. for each case, explain the significance of the decision in united states politics. ' mapp v. ohio (1961) ' gideon v. wainwright (1963) (b) identify which provision of the fourteenth amendment was applied to the following supreme court cases. for each case, explain the significance of the decision in united states politics. ' brown v. board of education (1954) ' baker v. carr (1962) ' regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:00
What role does the government have in resolving domestic disputes and disagreements
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Ateacher finds the distribution of scores on a final exam to be positively skewed with low variabili...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 21:30
question
English, 03.12.2020 21:30
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 21:30
question
Spanish, 03.12.2020 21:30
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 21:30
Questions on the website: 13722361