In "the mongols" j. m. roberts offers an example of the rapid spread of an early and very far reaching empire that the author argues "makes nonsense of chronological and territorial divisions" between societies and cultures.

True

Explanation:

The statement in the given problem is true. The author cited Roberts as a good example of an empire that was widely known by different people due to his attitudes and other qualities. The author also emphasis on the fact that there is a certain link between the societies and cultures which is true. Therefore, it can be concluded that the statement is true.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

idk if you found them already or not but you probably did but the one closer to sea level is raleigh.