Icarried out a series of experiments testing the effect of caffeine on mice. i used two mice. i fed one mouse caffeinated water and fed the other plain water. i then measured the ability of each mouse to find its way through a maze. i timed their progress. my results were exciting and conclusive, the caffeinated mouse found his way through the maze much more rapidly and accurately than the non-caffeinated mouse. i sent my results to a peer-reviewed journal but they rejected my paper. they said the results were not valid. why?

I didn't have enough mice in the study.                

Explanation:

Validity: In psychological research, the term validity is defined as a particular test's capability of measuring what the test is required to measure. In validity, the term valid refers to strong.

Types: Construct, face, criterion, conclusion, internal, and external validity.

In the question above, they said that the results were not valid because I didn't have enough mice in the study. For any research to work properly or give rise to a valid result then the research should include enough subjects to analyze the effect and therefore by having only two mice doesn't prove the study to be valid.

aliens are not real, the myth was created about 700 years ago because people found markings in the field of their crops. also, no there were no aliens on the moon.

hope this ! give brainliest!