Donovan volunteers his time to campaign for joel goodman. he spent all afternoon putting up goodman for congress signs around his town and arrived back at goodman headquarters just in time to watch the goodman- hernandez debate on tv. donovan was eager to watch the candidates debate each other, even though he was 100 sure he was going to vote for goodman. donovan's first response to the debate will most likely be a. i noticed that goodman and hernandez agreed on the new environmental policy. b. did you hear how well goodman answered that question on job creation? c. i wonder why goodman was so vague on the school tax issue when i know he has a clear idea about that. d. hernandez is really going to make this a tight race

Answer is Option B: Did you hear how well Goodman answered that question on job creation?

Explanation:

Since Donovan was sure that he would cote for Goodman, he would be supporting his thoughts. In order to support his thought, he would encourage the statements made by Goodman in the debate.

So, he would start his response with the statement praising Goodman that he spoke very well on job creation, Option B. He would not  criticize Goodman's statement by calling it vague as per Option C. Nor would he appreciate Hernandez saying he would make a tight race as per Option D.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

depends.

explanation: