Which of the following best describes how a federal judge could be removed from his/her position?
a.
if a federal judge commits a crime, he/she must first go through regular court proceedings, and if they are found guilty, they are ousted from office.
b.
if the president does not agree with a decision on a case, he may remove the judge from office immediately.
c.
if a judge commits any high crimes or misdemeanors, congress may remove the judge by impeaching him/her.
d.
if a majority in congress disagrees with a judge’s decision, they may vote to impeach him/her.

The correct answer is c) If a judge commits any high crimes or misdemeanors, Congress may remove the judge by impeaching him / her.

Explanation:

In many countries, some people with high positions in the state use their positions to commit crimes; in some of these countries, they can be tried regardless of their position; this is known as impeachment or process of dismissal.

For example, a federal judge who has committed some crimes can be prosecuted against a process of dismissal; this process is carried out when the congress charges the judge who committed the crime, after that the camera of representatives carry out the political judgment against the official. The chamber of representatives visualize all the points and vote; if the majority of the members vote against the official, the judge will be dismissed.

I hope this information can help you.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

no questions on whether they are allowed that right