Which statement describes an example of how judicial review applies to presidential actions? a. the court overturned a portion of the bipartisan campaign reform act. b. the court overturned state statutes that permitted segregation in schools. c. the court ruled that detained terror suspects are entitled to a lawyer. d. the court ruled that safe, legal abortion was a constitutionally protected right.

Option c

Explanation:

Presidential actions are actions carried out by the discretion of the presidency and it is entitled to be reviewed by the government.

From the above options in the questions, option c is the most likely that explains the judicial reviews that applies to presidential actions.

Yes the court can rule after a review that a terror suspects are entitled to a lawyer if it is constitutionally backed that every suspect is entitled to a lawyer. Also, if the evidences against such suspect requires that the case has to been charged in court, the judicial has the right to rule on the what ever actions the presidency might carried out. it all depends on the law and the judiciary

i think it's the cabinet

answer; coal reserves in the u.s are far greater than petroleum reserves;