Incarceration is just one of many factors that influence crime rates, and while incarcerating repeat violent offenders takes them off the streets, incarcerating nonviolent offenders has a minimal effect on crime rates. what conclusions can we then draw about the effectiveness of incarceration on reducing overall crime rates

Incarceration has had a limited impact on crime rates.                    

Explanation:

                 Incarceration means to confine somebody or restrain somebody within  certain limits in prison. Incarceration is one type of rehabilitation or punishment for felony offenses.

                United States have the largest population of prisoners in the world. According to the report of the Human Rights Watch, 2014 stated that U.S. after adopting the law of tough on crime have incarcerated many non violent offenders. But this policy failed to rehabilitate the offenders and it worsen their state after release from the incarceration. Thus the mass incarceration cannot ascribed the reduction in crime rates. Thus it has a limited influence on crime rates.

means you must be charged with a specific crime before being incarcerated.

C

Explanation:

all freedom fighters demanded for constitution. so british finally granted india it's freedom. then a constituent assembly was formed. it's chair man was rajendra prasad and its deputy chairman was dr. br ambedkar.

this assembly take the time of about one year than our constitution was finally formed.

explanation:

good question. i'll be looking into that. (this is a joke sir)