Before they married, melinda and michael, who are both employed full time and collect the same pay, agreed to share equally in routine household tasks such as cleaning and grocery shopping. in reality, melinda is now doing about 80 percent of the household work. this situation is an example of: a) an integrative disaster. b) an inequitable relationship. c) a social dilemma. d) a zero-sum relationship.

an inequitable relationship

Explanation:

Behavior psychologists define equity theory to determine the distribution of resources among the participants. According to the theory the resources are shared fairly between the relational partners. When a person gets more benefits than the efforts they put in, it will lead to inequality which results in guilt. Therefore for healthy relationship partners should get from relationship what they deserve.

As per the question Melinda who contributing more than her husband would feel dissatisfied with the relationship.

eat butt i think

explanation:

facts: the 14th amendment

the 14th amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws.

the 14th amendment was intended to protect the rights of former slaves after the american civil war.

the 14th amendment was approved by congress in june of 1866 and ratified by the states on july 9, 1868.

the 14th amendment establishes that all persons born in the united states are citizens and are guaranteed all the rights of citizenship.

the 14th amendment establishes that the law protects all citizens equally.

in this case the passage of the 14th amendment   that was violated was the last part in which it states that there is equal protection of the law.