Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:40
Imagine a child who consistently gets mediocre grades and is often picked last for a team when games are played at recess. however, he likes to make silly jokes and play pranks, and he notices that people laugh when he does those things. the child starts to think that others are laughing with him, not at him. this is part of the process that charles cooley
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
What important race leader of the early twentieth century is being described?
Answers: 1
Identify 4 ways children rights are breached...
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 19:30
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 19:30
Social Studies, 25.06.2019 19:30
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 19:30
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 19:30
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 19:30
Biology, 25.06.2019 19:30
Health, 25.06.2019 19:30