In the context of organizational justice, which of the following is concerned with followers' perceptions of whether the level of reward or punishment is commensurate with an individual's performance or infraction?

a). interactional justice
b). role ambiguity
c). role conflict
d). distributive justice

d). distributive justice

Explanation:

In philosophy, liberal thinkers have discussed what is justice, and how can a theory of Justice be measured in terms of the goals it seeks to achieve.

In simple words, we can see how punishments or rewards are proportionate to the actions of someone in correspondence to a society where ownership of goods is a highly deemed value.

The individual liberties are also defended and so, a society like the liberal society will assume that there is "a large amount of fairness in the distribution of goods". This means that punishments should correspond to the level of damage that the offender caused.

If someone is to consider a world where equal work should provide anyone with an equal outcome, and the terms to live in society, we expect that a crime like homicide should have the highest punishment in contrast to a minor like driving without a license.

Political liberalism will always foreseek mechanism for distributing justice.

The ultimate goal of distributive justice is to obtain equality not too much but not too little.- We seek to treat fair and see ourselves and others equally.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.