Social Studies, 27.11.2019 03:31 jaimejohnston2

After failing to set limits with her employer, leanne began to feel overwhelmed with her job at the counseling center. in addition to her regular duties, she was responsible for supervising all of the trainees. to manage her time, she spent a disproportionate amount of time with certain trainees and neglected others, assuming that they had the skills to fend for themselves. if a client of one of her neglected trainees decided to file a lawsuit, it is likely that leanne would bear:

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 13:30

Which is not an example of a financial intermediary

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30

Which of the following methods could be considered a "best practice" in terms of informing respondents how their answers to an on-line survey about personal information will be protected? respondents are informed that investigators will try to keep their participation confidential; however, confidentiality cannot be assured.respondents are informed that a research assistant will transfer all the research data to a password-protected computer that is not connected to the internet, via a usb flashdrive. the computer is located in a research team member's office.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain her institution's method for guaranteeing absolute confidentiality of research data.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' ip addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' ip addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30

Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

After failing to set limits with her employer, leanne began to feel overwhelmed with her job at the...

Questions