Imagine that 3 psychologists are having lunch together, and that you are eavesdropping on their conversation. there is a psychoanalyst (p), a behaviorist (b), and a humanist (h). which of the psychologists is most likely to have made each of the following statements?

i think people in our profession should put more effort into trying to understand mentally healthy people and pro-social behavior.
aggression is a human instinct. society can control it to some extent, but we will never eliminate aggressive behavior
if you want to understand why she did it, look to the environment for clues instead of at inferred internal forces like impulses or motives.
we humans are products of evolutionary forces that have preserved selfishness, pleasure-seeking, and a tendency to deceive ourselves.
it doesn't seem to me that you need to dig into a person's past in order to understand the person's current problems & concerns
there aren't any values inherent in human nature. values are acquired in the same way we learn to say "" and " you."
if we wanted to improve the character of people in our society, we would need to start when they are very young. by the time a child is five years old, it's probably too late.
you may think your choice of chili & ice cream for lunch was freely made, but your perception of free choice is an illusion. choosing chili and ice cream is predictable from the consequences of past behavior.
general laws of behavior and experience that apply to all people are not very if you want to understand a particular individual.
the sex drive is with us at birth. people just don't want to believe that infants get sexual pleasure from sucking & exploring anything they get in their hands with their mouths.

I think people in our profession should put more effort into trying to understand mentally healthy people and pro-social behavior.  (H )

Aggression is a human instinct. Society can control it to some extent, but we will never eliminate aggressive behavior  (P )

If you want to understand why she did it, look to the environment for clues instead of at inferred internal forces like impulses or motives.  (B )

We humans are products of evolutionary forces that have preserved selfishness, pleasure-seeking, and a tendency to deceive ourselves. (P)

It doesn't seem to me that you need to dig into a person's past in order to understand the person's current problems & concerns  (H)

There aren't any values inherent in human nature. Values are acquired in the same way we learn to say "please" and "thank you."  (B)

If we wanted to improve the character of people in our society, we would need to start when they are very young. By the time a child is five years old, it's probably too late.  (P)

You may think your choice of chili & ice cream for lunch was freely made, but your perception of free choice is an illusion. Choosing chili and ice cream is predictable from the consequences of past behavior.  (B)

General laws of behavior and experience that apply to all people are not very helpful if you want to understand a particular individual.  (H)

The sex drive is with us at birth. People just don't want to believe that infants get sexual pleasure from sucking & exploring anything they get in their hands with their mouths. (P)

Explanation:

Psychoanalysis is a branch of psychology that takes into account Freud's theory as a group of ideas or therapeutical techniques for the development of the human brain, taking into account all his experiences since the moment when he is born and all the accumulated ones through life.

Humanism is consider a branch in psychology that studies the human behavior as an entire world. In this way, human is not only analized since the perspective of the viewer of a certain huma, but also from his own view as he behaves.

Behavioral psychology refers to the theory that analyzes the way in which which the development of the human being is always conditioned through interaction with the surrounding world. Besides, this theory focuses also in the idea that at the same time, learning process in human beings is also conditioned through different factors that shape the actions.

step 1. boil eggs

step 2.eat eggs

step 3. get your hot poonts ready

marginal cost is a microeconomic measure that us to evaluate the extent to which the level of production of a good is sustainable in accounting, that is, to how many quantities the company plans to profit from the production of the good.

the concept of marginal cost is simple, it means the cost of producing one more item. for example, in the case of pies, the marginal cost is the cost of producing one more pie than those that have already been produced.

it is important to understand that productive activity influences marginal cost. the marginal cost of some goods can be very high, while others may be insignificant. for example, the marginal cost of producing an extra plane is very high. already the marginal cost of a water company to provide 1l more water is derisory.

in the case of pies, the cost involves the inputs, the labor and the fixed cost, which involves the fixed space of the bakery. the level of production initially has the marginal cost decreasing because there is space and manpower available. however, to produce more you have to hire more workers and buy more inputs. if physical space is limited, workers will conflict with places, inputs and their productivity will decrease, meaning there is an optimum point of production for each level of space and manpower. from this point on, the productivity of the workers will be getting smaller because of lack of space, so that the marginal cost of producing one more pie will be increasing. so, although you have not posted the chart, but if you have the answer, you can see that my explanation goes according to the marginal cost curve that will increase from the 4th pie, answer (c).