subject
Social Studies, 22.11.2019 01:31 solomander4

Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence. —alexander hamilton, federalist no. 78 why does hamilton think judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis? permanent appointments allow for greater regulation but less independence. periodic appointments promote a fatal independence. periodic appointments are hard to regulate. periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following contributed most to making the items listed in the box
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
2. explain the two different types of egyptian calendars. 3. what architectural advances did the ancient egyptians make? what impact do these advances have on our lives today? 4. what did egyptian art usually depict? how does this compare to forms of art that we see today? 5. what all was found in king tut’s tomb?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Which statement about mound builder works is true? earthen mounds were created for children to play on. bowls shaped like animals were made of stone. portraits were made of solid gold and painted with bright colors
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be f...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.08.2019 16:00
question
Mathematics, 18.08.2019 16:00
question
Mathematics, 18.08.2019 16:00
Questions on the website: 13722362