What could a potential senate filibuster have done for a bill attempting to desegregate the military? encouraged civil rights laws defeated the bill in the senate displayed an egalitarian attitude in the senate sent it directly to a house vote

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

How did adams use the judiciary act of 1801 to strengthen the power of the federalist? do you think that adams acted appropriately?

What is the primary difference between jefferson’s and madison’s beliefs about the bill of rights? jefferson believed that a bill of rights was unnecessary, while madison believed that it was necessary. madison believed that it was important to have a bill of rights to protect against the majority. jefferson believed that that the federal system would protect rights without a bill of rights. madison disagreed with jefferson’s belief that a bill of rights would protect citizens.