subject
Social Studies, 20.11.2019 00:31 mle531588

In support for the empathy-altruism hypothesis, researchers (toi & batson, 1982) found that participants were most likely to a student named carol who was injured in an automobile accident when they were told .to try to imagine how carol felt about what happened to her and how it changed her life. b. to be objective, and not to focus on how carol felt. c. that they would see carol every week in class. d. that they would never come face to face with carol.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following contributed most to making the items listed in the box
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Loftus used her research to prove that a. memories of childhood trauma are usually true b. adults’ memories are concrete and rigid c. children have better memories than adults d. false memories could be created using suggestion
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40
Which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations where staff from multiple agencies come together?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In support for the empathy-altruism hypothesis, researchers (toi & batson, 1982) found that par...
Questions
question
English, 07.03.2021 08:50
question
Mathematics, 07.03.2021 08:50
question
Health, 07.03.2021 08:50
Questions on the website: 13722367