Ok. down to business.

i've heard people say on the news things like "keep our borders open" and "america is a country that lets people in freely even without papers and etc"

now, this is coming from the news, media, etc.

but many americans who live in the places where illegal immigrants go to are tired of them coming in illegally, and they feel frightened, while the people who want open borders don't even live close to the illegal immigrants.

so, my question is,

do you think its right that america closes its borders, and keep our citizens safe?
or do you think we shouldn't close our borders, making our country open to people who don't come in legally and can possibly bring something new to our country like a new parasitic insect or disease.

note: i don't want to start any arguments, i'm just asking cause i never get to hear the peoples thought about open or closed borders.

you.

I just think everyone should be left in America, and no boards should be kept up. Scientifically no one is a 100% american, If you dated about everyone a thousand years back everyone traveld from another country, so technically If all immigrants had to go back to were they came from, no one would be left in Anerica(it would be deserted)

I literally asked my history teacher this today

idk if this is graded for ur homework, but I wouldnt trust me

the article must be ratified by three-fourths (38) of states within a proscribed deadline.

source:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.