subject
Social Studies, 12.11.2019 22:31 Jasten

Presented below are five scenarios where ethical violations may have occurred. the student should assess each scenario relative to whether it violates one or more of the following "ethical norms," or none at all. the norms, plus the "null hypothesis," are:

(1) organizational norms (o), which consist of workplace rules/expectations (e. g., be on time, don’t shirk your work, follow the patrol guide).
(2) professional norms (p), which are rules binding on members of one or another profession, (e. g., doctors must "do no harm," accountants must report honestly).
(3) legal norms (l), which are rules enshrined in constitutions, statute and common law, (e. g., no citizen shall be denied due process).
(4) social/ethical norms (s), which are widely held understandings between individuals about the treatment they expect from one another, (e. g., treat others as you would like to be treated).
(5) no norms violated (n). a null hypothesis!

to complete this exercise, after each case description below insert the letter or letters (o, p, l, s, or n) that represent your determination of what applies in each scenario. then take two of the cases and, to finish your answer, explain in more detail why the norms you chose apply.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
For what reason might an inmate be granted a furlough
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
Should the u.s limit the number of terms a lawmaker can serve in congress
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
What is a common factor all nonprofit businesses share? they pay no income tax.they have no capital.they are national in scope.they perform charitable acts.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40
Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Presented below are five scenarios where ethical violations may have occurred. the student should as...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 07:00
question
World Languages, 06.01.2021 07:00
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 07:00
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 07:00
question
Geography, 06.01.2021 07:00
Questions on the website: 13722367