For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists. the statements above best support which of the following conclusions? (a) where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.(b) where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.(c) binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.(d) most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.(e) a strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without from an arbitrator.