According to section 33 of the texas bill of rights (article 1 of the texas constitution), texans are guaranteed the right to use and access public beaches. this is not a right that is protected under the u. s. constitution. which concept allows texas to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the u. s. constitution

Texas is allowed to grant its citizens more rights than those listed in the U.S. Constitution by means of the doctrine of state rights.

Explanation:

The doctrine of state rights is based on the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution whereby it is set forth that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."  In the case at issue, Texas reserves the right to allow its citizens to have access to public beaches. Texas can do so because that right is not against any other right protected by the US Constitution. The rights granted under a state constitution can be broader than those included in the Federal Constitution but not narrower. A state is reserved the following powers: ownership of property, education, welfare and other benefit programs, judicial system, creation of a local government.

The "access to public beaches" may be included in the state power referred to above as "welfare and other benefit programs".

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

answer; generalizability;