Tim talon has been found by a court of law to be guilty of reckless driving and killing a pedestrian as a consequence. his defense was that he was driving under the influence of alcohol and lost control of his automobile. he was subsequently punished for his crime. how would the court classify tim talon's case for intent?

i really need the answer guys

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.

answer; mission;

answer; media advocacy;