subject
Social Studies, 17.10.2019 20:30 okstyles

Assume that you were a participant in the experiment conducted by festinger and carlsmith (1959) in which participants were paid either a large or small sum of money to tell an innocent stranger that the boring, tedious task they had just completed was really enjoyable and very interesting. further assume that you were paid a large amount of money to tell the stranger that lie. in this situation, you would be most likely to
a. convince yourself that the boring task was actually more interesting than you had previously thought.
b. maintain your original assessment of the task as dull and boring.
c. convince yourself that the stranger deserved to be lied to.
d. ask to complete the task again, given that you had high internal justification for doing so.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:40
Running and sleep. sufficient sleep is important for adolescents for both their neural and psychological development. despite this, daytıme sleepiness and poor physical and psychological functioning related to chronic sleep disturbances are common. there is a growing body of evidence that exercise is associated with both better sleep and improved psychological functioning sixty participants were recruited from a high school in northwesten switzerlandthey were randomly assigned to either a running group or a control group, 30 to each group the running group ran every moming for a little over 30 minutes on weekdays for a three-week period. all participants used a sleep log for subjective evaluation of sleep, and sleep was also objectively assessed at the beginning and end of the study using a sleep electroencephalographic device that measured quantities such as sleep efficiency and time spent in the four different sleep phases. running was found to have a positive impact on both objective and subjective measures of sleep functioning what are the explanatory variable(s) and the response variable(s)? (a) outline the design of the experiment (b) (c) here are some more details on the treatment and control groups. all participants arrived at school at 7 a.m., and the running group did two laps on the track and then ran cross countrv in groups of at least four people for 30 minutes the control group remained seated at the track, worked on horpework. and interacted with each other. when the runners returned, all participants prepared for school and ate a breaktast that was provided. iwhy do you think the experimenters had the control group arrive at 7 am interact withdassmates and have breaktast together? explain. do you think having the control eroup do these activities is important for the types of conclusion that can be reached? how?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
According to subpart d, research with children may be eligible for exemption when: the children will be asked to complete a surveythe research involves the use of educational teststhe children will be interviewed by the researcher.the research with children will involve participant observation with researcher interaction.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:10
You are a cfp and although you never went to law school, you consider yourself to be very good at reviewing wills. your client, catherine, asks you to prepare a will for her. should you prepare a will for catherine? a. yes, catherine is your best client and you might lose her if you do not prepare the will.b. yes, it is permissible for a cfp to prepare a legal document. c. no, preparing catherine's will would be considered the unauthorized practice of law.d. no, you should only prepare catherine's will if you are going to prepare her husband's will as well.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Assume that you were a participant in the experiment conducted by festinger and carlsmith (1959) in...
Questions
question
English, 14.06.2021 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.06.2021 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.06.2021 17:00
question
Mathematics, 14.06.2021 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722361