Will has eight puppies. he is concerned his puppies may be infected with parvo, a disease that is deadly in young dogs unless diagnosed and treated early. the cost of the test to determine if the dog has parvo is $59. will cannot afford to have all of his puppies tested. the veterinarian has suggested that will reach into the pen where the dogs stay and pick up the first one that walks into his hand. (if one dog tests positive, then will can assume that all the puppies are infected. if the puppy is not infected, then will can assume that his puppies are healthy.) what kind of a sampling technique is the vet suggesting will use?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.