The government of thailand passes a law stating that no u. s. dollars are allowed to enter the country. americans traveling to thailand therefore may not bring dollars with them. all dollars have to be exchanged for the thailand domestic currency (thai baht) at any border crossing, airport, or train station. laura, a u. s. citizen, files a lawsuit against thailand in a u. s. court challenging the legality of this law. laura will most likely:
a. not prevail because of the act of state doctrine.
b. prevail because the law clearly violates the u. s. constitution
c. prevail because of the doctrine of comity
d. not prevail because laura has sovereign immunity

John lennon and paul mccartney belonged to this group

How did the romanov dynasty increase russia's power?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.