In the early to mid-nineteenth century, property qualifications for voting: a. were escalating in all of new england. b. disappeared because of the voting rights act championed by president andrew jackson. c. died out entirely, allowing all whites to vote in every state. d. were not required in any of the states after the original thirteen. e. survived in all of the slave states but in none of the free states.

d. were not required in any of the states after the original thirteen.

Explanation:

During colonial voting, there used to be property requirements. In some colonies, the requirement was for the voter to be the owner of a specific amount of land or some land of a particular value. Others required personal property of a specific value or payment of a specific amount of taxes. However, property restrictions slowly disappeared in the 19th Century. At first, tax-paying requirements instead of property ownership were necessary, even though these also disappeared after the 1820s. After the original thirteen, the majority of economic barriers to voting were inexistent.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.