Social Studies, 26.09.2019 02:00 lcidsjay

What is the difference between locke and hobbe's ideas about the state of nature?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: rashawng2005

Thomas Hobbes holds a negative idea of the state of nature, whereas for John Locke the state of nature is not a state of war.

Explanation:

The state of nature according to Hobbes is a state of permanent war, a constant menace to the sustained survival of the individual. Greed leads men to compete for dominance, so men become wolfs to other men.

On the other hand, Locke´s state of nature is characterized as a state of equality and perfect freedom, with two fundamental rights: to punish crime through an authorized person, and the right to demand repairs to guarantee its preservation.

In opposition to Hobbes, Locke states that natural laws exist in the state of nature, and are fundamental traits of human nature.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

where is the map so i can

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:10

Prior to 1994, rwanda's ethnic population was composed of a. a tutsi minority and a hutu majority b. a hutu minority and a tutsi majority c. an even number of hutus and tutsis d. a rwandan majority with hutu and tutsi minorities select the best answer from the choices provided. a b c d

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30

The internet is controlled by: (select one): a. statutes and court cases in federal and state courts in the united states. b. the advanced research projects agency (arpa) and the u.s. department of defense. c. no single government or organization. d. google, yahoo, and the other search engines which have proprietary interest in the content thereon.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00

Though most presidents have claimed affiliation with a christian church, the only roman catholic president has been a) abraham lincoln. b) john f. kennedy. c) george washington. d) franklin d. roosevelt.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:40