Afarmer created a natural fertilizer and is testing the mixture his corn crop this year. this table shows amount of corn grown with and without fertilizer. the corn in group a was divided into acres and each acre was given a specific amount of fertilizer. none of the corn in group b was given fertilizer. which statement best elaborates on this farmer's method of testing? a) this test required him to plant various amounts of corn on each acre, which allowed him to compare how well corn grows in a given space. b) this test allowed him to compare crop results with and without the fertilizer, and it also provided data on the best amount of fertilizer to use. c) this test allowed him to compare not only his fertilizer, but the soil quality as well, since he planted two groups of corn on different plots of land. d) this test required him to separate his property into twelve acres, but it revealed which acres have the best irrigation and responded to the fertilizer.

Answer asap! what was one main difference between japanese and european feudalism? a)japanese feudalism emerged out of a period of violence; european feudalism did not.b)japanese feudalism was influenced by religions other than christianity.european feudalism involved the exchange of land for services; c)japanese feudalism did not.d)japanese samurai and european knights did not follow similar codes of conduct.

Where is sub-saharan africa located?

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.