Martin files a suit against nichelle in a state court over payment due on a short-term employment contract. the case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. the case is appealed to an appellate court. after the state's highest court's review of martin v. nichelle, a party can appeal the decision to the united states supreme court if

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy