How do the following main points for a speech about the achievements of ida wells-barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points? i. as a teacher, wells-barnett spoke out against inferior school facilities for african-american children. ii. as a journalist, well-barnett campaigned against lynching. iii. in the early 20th century, wells-barnett expanded her activities.

As bob is driving on an exit off the freeway, he comes to a stop light and sees a homeless man asking people for spare change. “see, he’s a perfect example of why we shouldn’t be giving welfare benefits to the homeless,” bob mutters to his wife. “he’s too lazy to get a job, but he’s healthy enough to beg people for their hard-earned money all day long.” what are the sample and the target in bob’s argument? are there any inductive fallacies present in bob’s reasoning (bias, hastiness, appeal to anecdotal evidence, self-selection)? if so, explain why. if not, explain why not.