Social Studies, 06.09.2019 05:20 biancasamadp3usfw

In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the federalists and the anti-federalists at the constitutional convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: lexi7149

Here are the basic arguments mentioned by both sides:

- The federalist

> They believe that having a strong central governments make it easier for the government to enforce the laws and regulations to the citizens. (Since they intended to establish that the central government's intention will have higher authority compared to the citizen's intention)

> It will make the Bill making process become faster and more efficient (since they don't have to argue about it with the states representative over and over again)

> It will make it easier for the government to control the economic condition (since they will have full power in determining the taxation of the people without having to argue with the states)

- The anti-federalist

> Strong central government will create a huge risk of oppression of the people. They fear that if they let the government become too strong, united states will transform into tyrannical government where the leader have uncontrolled authority, like the English government at that time.

> They argue that implementation of the laws will be easier if they give local and states government their own autonomy, since they can understand what their people need better than the central government.

Answer from: Quest

intimacy, passion and commitment are the components of a interpersonal relationship emphasized in the triangular theory of love by robert sternberg.

the triangular theory of love says love can be comprehend as this componest form the vertices of a triangle.

intimacy relates to feelings such as of closeness and connection;

passion relates the drives that brings people together, as physical attraction.

commitment relates to the being in a long-term relationship.

Answer from: Quest

this is a pretty broad question and can be a pretty lengthy answer. since 1900, women have gained a lot more rights and have become active in the workforce. with women being in the workforce, men play a larger role in family life. many family tasks are shared between men and women, whereas, women used to be the sole family caretakers.

that should get you started at least.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30

What consequences could gen galvez have faced for his major act of bravery?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30

As well as a constitutional human right to associate with whomever you , there should be a corresponding right to disassociate if you .” - lester maddox which statement about lester maddox is best supported by information from the quotation? question 1 options: lester maddox was a segregationist. lester maddox enforced the constitution. lester maddox believed in the freedom to associate. lester maddox supported the 1964 civil rights act.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00

1. create a hypothetical story of how a violent conflict arose between two groups. in your story, include examples of how in-group bias, out-group homogeneity, out-group derogation, and scapegoat theory lead toward violence between groups. be sure to label each term where it occurs in your story (20 points)

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:20

According to the world bank, e.u. remittances to senegal were $1,005,728,139$1,005,728,139 in 2015. senegal's gross domestic product (gdp) was $13,779,570,750$13,779,570,750 in 2015. what percentage of senegal's 2015 gdp is represented by the remittances? round your answer to one place after the decimal. remittances as percent of gdp: %% based on the washington post article, e.u. launches $2 billion plan to keep africans from migrating, which explanation correctly explains why senegal's government would or would not implement policies to restrict illegal migration from senegal to the european union? because remittances represent such a large percentage of senegal's gdp, senegal's government faces an incentive to do nothing to stop illegal migration to the european union. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces no incentive to crack down on illegal migration. because remittances represent such a small percentage of national income, senegal's government does not find it worth its time to implement policies to prevent illegal migration. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces a large incentive to crack down on illegal migration.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the federalists and the anti-federalists...

Questions