Hunter carr is an accountant with acctsmart. the firm has a very strict policy of requiring all users to change their passwords every sixty days. in early march, hunter received an e-mail claiming that there had been an error updating his password and it provided hunter with a link to a website with instructions for re-updating his password. something about the e-mail made hunter suspicious, so he called acctsmart's information technology department and found that the e-mail was fictitious. the e-mail was an example of◦ social engineering.◦ piggybacking.◦ spamming.◦ phishing.

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?