The following appeared as part of a campaign statement for velazquez, who is seeking election as alderman in the town of barchester: "under police commissioner draco, the city of spartanburg began jailing people for committing petty crimes such as littering, shoplifting, and spraying graffiti. criminals in spartanburg must have understood that lawlessness would no longer be tolerated, because the following year spartanburg saw a 20% drop in violent crimes such as homicide. our town should learn from commissioner draco’s success, and begin a large-scale crackdown on petty crime."discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. in your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. for example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. you can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would you better evaluate its conclusion.