To avoid the classic design mistake of “silver bullet syndrome,” the analyst should select one: a. increase the schedule to include learning time b. move proposed changes into future versions c. not switch or upgrade development tools unless there is a compelling need d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true e. use rapid application development techniques or timeboxing

d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true

Explanation:

Silver Bullet Syndrome defined as the belief that the next drastic change in  tools, resources or procedures will put an end to all the problems that exist within a company. According to my research on the silver bullet syndrome, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the analyst should not use a design tool that appears too good to be true. Since designs like this that provide miraculous solutions are always false or wrong.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

even though you have attached neither the chart nor the generalizations, i have located them online. the right answer is d, since they are asking you about a generalization. you can only infer from the chart that between 2008 and 2009 the number of employed workers decreased significantly (from over 115 millions to 107 millions approximately), which signals some type of economic crisis.