subject
Social Studies, 05.08.2019 22:10 putaprincess16

Hyde, an escapee from a mental hospital for the criminally insane, kidnapped vic, a prominent citizen of gotham. in a message to the gotham police, hyde warned that he would kill vic if (a) hyde’s identity as the kidnapper was divulged to the public or (b) the press, gotham’s leading local newspaper, failed to publish prominently and in its entirety hyde’s political “manifesto,” an incoherent essay of over 20,000 words, within 48 hours. hyde’s message was somehow leaked to a reporter of the press at police headquarters. asserting that journalistic integrity was at stake and that the cost would be exorbitant, the press rejected an urgent request from the gotham police chief for compliance with hyde's demands. vic's family immediately filed an injunctive action in state court against the press, obtaining an ex parte temporary injunction prohib­iting the press from publishing hyde's identity as the kidnapper and mandating it to publish hyde's full "manifesto" in a main edition of the press within 48 hours. publishing the "manifesto" in accordance with the temporary injunction will cost the press over $175,000 in lost advertising revenue and overtime wages. the press has timely moved to dissolve the temporary injunction on the grounds that it violates rights guaranteed by the first amendment and by the "takings clause" of the fifth amendment to the u. s. constitution.1. what arguments can the press reasonably make in support of the motion to dissolve the injunction, and how should the court rule? discuss.2. may the press ignore the temporary injunction without incurring liability for contempt? discuss.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30
Give an example of a situation in which an individual's pursuit of economic self-interest may not benefit but instead harm the rest of society
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
What challenges did nigeria faced after it gained its independence from britain
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
Based on this map, what can be concluded about the inca empire? (4 points) it was in a highlands region. it was in a mountainous region. it was in the amazon basin. it was in north america.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Hyde, an escapee from a mental hospital for the criminally insane, kidnapped vic, a prominent citize...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 22:50
question
Health, 05.11.2020 22:50
Questions on the website: 13722363