Afee simple owner of a restaurant provided in his will that the property should go on his death "in fee simple to my friend, but if during my friend's lifetime my son has children and those children are alive when my friend dies, then to said living children." when the owner died, the friend took over the restaurant. if the son has children and one or more of them are alive when the friend dies, who will take title to the restaurant at that time? a the friend's heirs, because the attempted gift to the son's children is invalid under the rule against perpetuities. b the son's children, because their interest is not contingent, being a possibility of reverter. c the son's children, because their interest is vested, subject to defeasance. d the son's children, because their interest will vest, if at all, within a life in being + 21 years.

Who gave the famous "i have a dream" speech at the march on washington?

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)

Which argument for religious reform might be convincing to a priest, pope, or king?