What is the primary difference between jefferson’s and madison’s beliefs about the bill of rights? jefferson believed that a bill of rights was unnecessary, while madison believed that it was necessary. madison believed that it was important to have a bill of rights to protect against the majority. jefferson believed that that the federal system would protect rights without a bill of rights. madison disagreed with jefferson’s belief that a bill of rights would protect citizens.

1. Jefferson's Party - the Democratic-Republicans

** were headed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison

** were in favor of a weak central government

** believed power should be centered in the legislative branch

** opposed most of Alexander Hamilton's economic policies (assumption, national bank)

** were in favor of the farmer as opposed to the merchant (particularly Jefferson)

** strict constructionists

** would have 3 presidents of their party - Madison, Jefferson, and Monroe

2. Hamilton's Party - the Federalists

** were headed by Alexander Hamilton (primarily)

** were in favor of a strong central government

** believed power should be centered in the executive branch

** favored most of Alexander Hamilton's economic policies (how they got started)

** were in favor of the merchant as opposed to the farmer (particularly Hamilton)

** were loose constructionist

** would have 1 president of their party - Adams

Explanation:

Letter D

Explanation: Madison disagreed with Jefferson’s belief that a bill of rights would protect citizens. Madison objected at first because it would only imply that there rights that government does not protect and that it would be a hindrance that would oppose the power of government.  It was only when he added the amendments he made that he changed his mind.

step 1. boil eggs

step 2.eat eggs

step 3. get your hot poonts ready

well it depends i think people around the world are coming around to gay marriage. but if you are talking abortion then wow, so much to talk about. such as men thinking they have the right to choose if women can, the fact there are health concerns if the women can't get one, and many more arguments to discuss. so i would definitely say abortion would be a much more interesting topic.